File #: GID-1718-45    Version: 1 Name: Purchase of equipment for in-car/body worn solution.
Type: Authorization for Purchase Status: Passed
File created: 1/14/2018 In control: City Council
On agenda: 1/23/2018 Final action: 1/23/2018
Title: AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF SIXTY (60) BODY CAMERAS, FOUR (4) TRANSFER STATIONS, TWENTY-FIVE (25) BODY MOUNTS, AND ONE (1) SOFTWARE LICENSE FOR REDACTIVE/EDITING CAPABILITY FROM WATCH GUARD VIDEO IN THE AMOUNT OF $113,155 FOR THE NORMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT.
Attachments: 1. Text File PD Equipment, 2. WatchGuard Quote issued 1-10-2018, 3. WatchGuard Video Purchase Order
Title
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF SIXTY (60) BODY CAMERAS, FOUR (4) TRANSFER STATIONS, TWENTY-FIVE (25) BODY MOUNTS, AND ONE (1) SOFTWARE LICENSE FOR REDACTIVE/EDITING CAPABILITY FROM WATCH GUARD VIDEO IN THE AMOUNT OF $113,155 FOR THE NORMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT.

Body
BACKGROUND: PSST funds in the amount of $750,000 were approved in fiscal year 2013-2014 (FYE 2014) for the purchase of an in-car/body worn solution for the police department. These funds were allocated to the Public Safety Sales Tax Fund, Plant & Operating-Audio/Visual System (account 015-6122-421.51-10).

After a Request for Proposal process (RFP #1314-53) in 2014, MediaSolv was selected as the vendor to supply the video systems and a contract was signed with them in February of 2015. After being paid the first two installments of the contract, MediaSolv advised us that they were being purchased by Taser International in May of 2015 and could not supply the cameras specified in the contract. Due to this and the fact that they were purchased by a company that had bid against them in the RFP process, we considered this a breach and started the process to terminate the contract. This contract was terminated and a refund of $259,731.80 from MediaSolv/Taser was reallocated into the Audio/Visual System account.

A new RFP process (RFP #1516-45) was started in January of 2016 to select a new company to supply a video solution for the Police Department. Seven (7) companies responded to the RFP and after scoring the field was narrowed to three for field testing. After field testing, Watch Guard was selected as the best fit for the City of Norman by the evaluation panel. The decision to go with Watch Guard was unanimous among the panel and the field testers. This selection was based on the integration their body camera has with their in-car system, ease of use of the body camera, the kiosk check-out ability, and the quality of the audio and video.

Council approved contract K-1617-84 with Wat...

Click here for full text